Michael Isikoff was once Newsweek’s top investigative reporter. He tweeted something unintentionally funny about a New York Times article.
“In the category of — didn’t see this coming,” he wrote, “The @nytimes confirms the authenticity of Hunter Biden emails derived from his laptop that had been previously dismissed as Russian disinformation.”
The obvious joke about “didn’t see this coming” is that Hunter Biden’s laptop is one of those scandals that they would prefer to squash until about 2028. In October 2020, Twitter and Facebook heavily censored New York Post stories on Biden’s laptop with the excuse that “security officials” (guess which party) cried, “Russian plot.”
As columnist Tim Carney notes, it’s late for griping about Big Tech censorship back then, but it still underlines the question, “Just what are the tech platforms and the major media colluding to lie about right now? What are our gatekeepers covering up today?”
Let’s add to that: Why is a news story “illegitimate” until “prestige media” outlets arrive on the scene, years after the original conservative scoops? The Times story was buried on page A-20 of the print edition on St. Patrick’s Day. In the second half of paragraph 23, the trio of Katie Benner, Kenneth Vogel, and Michael Schmidt announced The Times obtained the emails “from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop that was left abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop.”
The Hunter Biden story was blandly blurbed on the bottom of the front page as “Biden’s Son Pays a Tax Bill.” It sounded as harmless as a kiddie book like “Curious George Saves His Pennies.” The TV networks yawned and reported nothing. The headline inside also said “Biden’s Son Paid Off Tax Bill, but Still Faces Inquiry by Grand Jury.”
The Times couldn’t even note in the blurb or headline that the tax payoff was said to be more than $1 million. We’re told that paying off your (huge) tax liability is one way to make it harder for prosecutors to win a criminal conviction for tax avoidance.
Biden is also being investigated because he failed to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act for all of his international exploitations of Vice President Daddy. The Times reported that Hunter was sensitive about avoiding any embarrassment. Problems with Foreign Agents Registration Act
In his dealings with the Ukrainian oil and gas firm Burisma, Hunter Biden recommended enlisting the law firm where he worked at the time, Boies Schiller Flexner, to “devise a media plan and arrange for legal protections and mitigate U.S. domestic negative press regarding the current leadership if need be.”
One wonders if they really needed much help in “mitigating negative press” with The New York Times and the rest.
Perhaps they were referring to conservative outlets like Fox News and The New York Post. At the end of the story, The Times reported on prosecutors meeting with a “former employee of Mr. Biden’s, Lunden Alexis Roberts,” asking “which corporate entity” Hunter used to pay her for … nine months.
This is obfuscating the woman who the racier New York Post described as Hunter’s “baby mama,” the “stripper.” Roberts, who once danced at the Mpire Gentleman’s Club in Washington, D.C., has a 3-year-old daughter fathered by Hunter Biden named Navy Roberts.
The White House displayed the stockings of grandchild stockings last Christmas, but the little girl was not included.
This is where you laugh at reporters who boast that “our only bias is in favor of a good story.” Juicy stories dry up and waste away all the time when they’re about Democrats.
COPYRIGHT 2022. CREATORS.COM
The Daily Signal is open to all perspectives. Nothing here should be taken to mean that The Heritage Foundation views are represented.
You have an opinion on this article? Please email to share your thoughts. [email protected] and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Be sure to include the article’s URL, headline, and your name.