Within the Blindman’s Buff variation of tag, a baby designated as “It” is tasked with tapping one other little one whereas carrying a blindfold. The sightless little one is aware of the opposite kids, all capable of see, are there however is left to stumble round, utilizing sounds and information of the house they’re in as guides. Lastly, that little one does succeed, both by bumping into somebody, peeking, or due to sheer dumb luck.
Consider us, the American public, as that blindfolded little one in terms of our authorities’s torture program that adopted the 9/11 catastrophe and the launching of the ill-fated conflict on terror. We’ve been left to go looking at nighttime for what so many people sensed was there.
We’ve been groping for the details surrounding the torture program created and applied by the administration of President George W. Bush. For 20 years now, the hunt for its perpetrators, the locations the place they brutalized detainees, and the methods they used has been underway. And for 20 years, makes an attempt to maintain that blindfold in place within the identify of “nationwide safety” have helped maintain darkness over mild.
From the start, the torture program was enveloped in a language of darkness with its secret “black sites” the place savage interrogations came about and the endless blacked-out pages of documents which may have revealed extra in regards to the horrors being dedicated in our identify. As well as, the destruction of proof and the squelching of internal reports solely expanded that seemingly bottomless abyss that also, partially, confronts us. In the meantime, the courts and the justice system persistently supported those that insisted on conserving that blindfold in place, claiming, for instance, that had been protection attorneys to be given particulars in regards to the interrogations of their purchasers, nationwide safety would by some means be compromised.
Lastly, nonetheless, greater than 20 years after all of it started, the tide might actually be turning.
Regardless of fervid makes an attempt to maintain that blindfold in place, the search has not been in useless. Quite the opposite, over these final 20 years, its layers have slowly worn away, thread by thread, revealing, if not the complete image of these medieval-style practices, then a damning set of details and pictures regarding torture, American-style, on this century. Cumulatively, investigative journalism, authorities stories, and the testimony of witnesses have revealed a fuller image of the locations, individuals, nightmarish methods, and outcomes of that program.
The fraying of that blindfold took infinite years, beginning in December 2002, when Washington Put up writers Dana Priest and Barton Gellman reported on the existence of secret detention and interrogation facilities in international locations across the planet the place merciless, illegal methods had been getting used in opposition to war-on-terror captives in American custody. Quoting from a 2001 State Division report on the therapy of captives, they wrote, “Probably the most incessantly alleged strategies of torture embody sleep deprivation, beatings on the soles of the toes, extended suspension with ropes in contorted positions and prolonged solitary confinement.”
Lower than a yr later, the American Civil Liberties Union, together with different teams, filed a Freedom of Information Act request (the primary of many) for data pertaining to detention and interrogation within the conflict on terror. Their purpose was to observe the path resulting in “quite a few credible stories recounting the torture and rendition of detainees” and our authorities’s efforts (or the dearth thereof) to conform “with its authorized obligations with respect to the infliction of merciless, inhuman, or degrading therapy or punishment.”
Then, in 2004, the blindfold started to indicate some preliminary indicators of damage. That spring, CBS News’s 60 Minutes II confirmed the primary pictures of males held at Abu Ghraib, an American-controlled jail in Iraq. They had been, amongst different issues, visibly bare, hooded, shackled, and threatened by canines. These footage despatched journalists and authorized advocates right into a frenzied seek for solutions to how such a factor had occurred within the wake of the Bush administration’s invasion of Iraq. By that fall, that they had obtained inside authorities paperwork exempting any conflict on terror captives from the same old authorized protections from cruelty, abuse, and torture. Documents additionally appeared by which particular methods of torture, renamed “enhanced interrogation methods” (EITs), had been licensed by prime officers of the Bush administration. They might be used on prisoners in secret CIA areas around the globe (119 males in 38 or extra international locations).
None of this, nonetheless, but added as much as “Tag! I discovered you!”
Senator Feinstein’s Investigation
Earlier than George Bush left workplace, Senator Dianne Feinstein started a congressional investigation into the CIA interrogation program. Within the Obama years, she would battle to mount a full-scale one into the torture program, defying most of her colleagues, who most well-liked to observe President Obama’s advice to “look ahead versus wanting backwards.”
However Feinstein refused to again down (and we must always honor her braveness and dedication, whilst we witness the present drama of her insistence on remaining within the Senate regardless of a devastating technique of getting older). As an alternative of retreating, Feinstein solely doubled down and, as chair of the Senate Choose Committee on Intelligence, launched an in-depth investigation into the torture program’s evolution and the grim therapy of these prisoners at what got here to be often known as “CIA black websites.”
Feinstein’s investigator, Daniel Jones, spent years studying via six million pages of paperwork. Lastly, in December 2014, her committee issued a 525-page “executive summary” of his findings. But his full report — 6,700 pages with 35,300 footnotes — remained categorised on the grounds that, had been the general public to see it, nationwide safety is perhaps harmed. Nonetheless, that abstract convincingly laid out not simply the widespread use of torture however the way it “proved to not be an efficient technique of acquiring correct data.” In doing so, it dismantled the CIA’s justification for its EITs which rested on “claims of their effectiveness.”
In the meantime, Leon Panetta, Obama’s director of the CIA, carried out an inside investigation into torture. By no means declassified, the Panetta Review, because it got here to be identified, reportedly discovered that the CIA had inflated the worth of the data it had gotten with using torture methods. For instance, within the brutal interrogation of the alleged mastermind of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the Company claimed that these methods had elicited data from him that helped thwart additional terrorist plots. In reality, the data had been obtained from different sources. The evaluation reportedly acknowledged that EITs had been in no way as effective because the CIA had claimed.
The Cultural Sphere
In these years, bits of sunshine from the cultural world started to light up the darkish horror of these enhanced interrogation methods. In 2007, after President Bush had acknowledged using simply such “methods” and had moved 14 detainees from the CIA’s black websites to Guantánamo, his notorious offshore jail of injustice in Cuba, documentary filmmaker Alex Gibney directed Taxi to the Dark Side. It instructed the story of Dilawar, a taxi driver in Afghanistan who died in American custody after extreme mistreatment. That movie can be one of many earliest public exposés of cruelty and mistreatment within the conflict on terror.
However such movies didn’t always yield doses of sunshine. In 2012, as an example, Zero Darkish Thirty, a film closely influenced by CIA advisers, argued that these harsh interrogations had helped maintain America safer — particularly by main U.S. authorities to bin Laden, a meme usually repeated by authorities officers. In reality, dependable data resulting in bin Laden had been obtained with out these methods.
More and more, nonetheless, movies started to focus on the voices of those that had been tortured. The Mauritanian, for instance, was primarily based on Guantánamo Diary, a memoir by Mohamedou Ould Slahi, a tortured Mauritanian held at that jail for 14 years. Slahi, by no means charged, was lastly launched and returned to Mauritania. As New York Instances reporter Carol Rosenberg summed up his expertise, “The confessions he made underneath duress [were] recanted [and] a proposed case in opposition to him [was] deemed by the prosecutor to be nugatory in court docket due to the brutality of the interrogation.”
Final yr, award-winning documentary filmmaker Alex Gibney as soon as once more gave us a movie on torture, The Endlessly Prisoner, targeted on a Guantánamo detainee, Abu Zubaydah, whose actual identify is Zayn al-Abidin Muhammed Husayn. On him, the CIA first examined its harsh interrogation methods, claiming he was a number one member of al-Qaeda, an assumption later disproved. He stays one in every of solely three Gitmo detainees neither charged by the navy commissions at that jail, nor cleared for launch.
Nothing captures the futility of the blindfold — or generally even the futility of lifting it — greater than Zubaydah’s story, which was on the coronary heart of the story of torture in these years. The Senate Choose Committee’s 525-page government abstract referred to him a minimum of 1,343 occasions.
Captured in Pakistan in 2002 and first taken to a collection of black websites for interrogation, Zubaydah was initially believed to be the third highest-ranking member of al-Qaeda, a declare later deserted, together with the allegation that he had even been a member of that terrorist group. He was the detainee for whom enhanced interrogation methods had been first licensed by Nationwide Safety Advisor Condoleezza Rice, relying partially on the Justice Division’s greenlighting of such methods as “lawful” moderately than as torture (legally forbidden underneath each home and worldwide legislation). Joe Margulies, Zubaydah’s lawyer, summarized the horrific methods used on him this manner:
“His captors hurled him into partitions and crammed him into bins and suspended him from hooks and twisted him into shapes that no human physique can occupy. They saved him awake for seven consecutive days and nights. They locked him, for months, in a freezing room. They left him in a pool of his personal urine. They strapped his fingers, toes, arms, legs, torso, and head tightly to an inclined board, along with his head decrease than his toes. They lined his face and poured water up his nostril and down his throat till he started to breathe the water, in order that he choked and gagged because it crammed his lungs. His torturers then left him to pressure in opposition to the straps as he started to drown. Repeatedly. Till, simply when he believed he was about to die, they raised the board lengthy sufficient for him to vomit the water and retch. Then they lowered the board and did it once more. The torturers subjected him to this therapy not less than eighty-three occasions in August 2002 alone. On not less than one such event, they waited too lengthy and Abu Zubaydah practically died on the board.”
As well as, as Dexter Filkins reported within the New Yorker in 2016, Zubaydah misplaced his left eye whereas in CIA custody.
Because the Feinstein committee’s torture report makes clear, CIA personnel current at that black website cabled again to Washington the significance of erasing any details about the character of Zubaydah’s interrogation, implicitly acknowledging simply how wrongful his therapy had been. The July 2002 cable requested for “affordable assurance that [Abu Zubaydah] will stay in isolation and incommunicado for the rest of his life.” CIA higher-ups assured the brokers that “all main gamers are in concurrence that [Abu Zubaydah] ought to stay incommunicado for the rest of his life.”
Sadly sufficient, that promise has been saved to this very day. In 2005, CIA officers authorized the destruction of the tapes of Zubaydah’s questioning and, by no means charged with a criminal offense, he’s nonetheless in Guantánamo.
And but, regardless of the promise that he would stay incommunicado, with every passing yr we study extra about what was carried out to him. In October 2021, in truth, within the United States v. Zubaydah, the justices of the Supreme Courtroom for the primary time brazenly mentioned his therapy and Justices Sonia Sotomayer, Neil Gorsuch, and Elena Kagan publicly used the word “torture” to describe what was carried out to him.
Elsewhere as nicely, the blindfold has been shredded in terms of the horror of torture, as ever extra of Zubaydah’s story continues to see the sunshine of day. This Could, the Guardian revealed a narrative a couple of report carried out by the Middle for Coverage and Analysis at Seton Corridor College Regulation Faculty that included a collection of 40 drawings Zubaydah had made and annotated at Guantánamo. In them, he graphically depicted his torture at CIA black websites and at that jail.
The photographs are past grotesque and, like a cacophonous symphony you may’t flip off, it’s exhausting to witness them with out closing your eyes. They present beating, shackling from the ceiling, sexual abuse, waterboarding, confinement in a coffin, and a lot extra. In a single image that he titled “The Vortex,” the methods had been mixed as Zubaydah — in a self-portrait — cries out in agony. Testifying to the accuracy of the scenes he drew, the faces of his torturers have been blacked out by the authorities to guard their identities.
Because the Guardian‘s Ed Pilkington reported, Helen Duffy, Mr. Zubaydah’s worldwide authorized consultant, highlighted how “exceptional” it was that his drawings had ever seen the sunshine of day although he hasn’t “been capable of talk instantly with the skin world” in all these infinite years.
Within the years of the Biden presidency, the worldwide neighborhood has targeted on Guantánamo in unprecedented methods. In January 2022, “after 20 years and nicely over 100 visits,” the Worldwide Committee of the Crimson Cross (the ICRC) referred to as for the discharge of as most of the remaining prisoners there as doable and, extra lately, raised alarm over the failing well being and untimely getting older of its 30 getting older inmates.
Lately, the United Nations carved out new floor as nicely. In April, the U.N. Working Group on Arbitrary Detention issued an opinion condemning the brutality lengthy used in opposition to Mr. Zubaydah and referred to as for his instant launch. That group additional famous that the continued detention of the prisoners at Guantánamo might probably “represent crimes in opposition to humanity.”
With every passing yr, ever extra particulars about Washington’s torture packages have come to mild. But, even now, ferocious makes an attempt are nonetheless being made to maintain the blindfold in place. Because of this, to this present day we’re left looking out, arms prolonged, whereas those that have essential details about this nation’s nightmarish dedication to torture do their finest to keep away from us, hoping that the infinite passage of time will maintain them out of attain till we pursuers lastly run out of vitality.
To this present day, a lot nonetheless stays in darkness, whereas Congress and American policymakers proceed to refuse to deal with the legacy of such wrongdoing. However because the fixed dribble of knowledge suggests, the story merely received’t go away till, sometime, the USA formally acknowledges what it did — what, if others had been now doing it, can be immediately denounced by the identical lawmakers and policymakers. That historical past of torture received’t go away, in truth, till this nation apologizes for it, declassifies as a lot of the Feinstein report as doable, and offers for the rehabilitation of Abu Zubaydah and others whose bodily and psychological well being was savaged by their mistreatment at American fingers.
It’s one factor to say, as Barack Obama told Congress a month into his presidency, that the USA “doesn’t torture.” It’s one other to reveal the misdeeds of the conflict on terror and settle for the prices as deterrence in opposition to it ever occurring once more.
Behind each nice article is a journalist working tirelessly to carry you the reality.
The world desperately wants journalism that investigates, stories on, and analyzes complicated points with honesty and integrity. We’d like journalism that may maintain these in energy accountable, shine a light-weight on injustices, and provides voice to the unvoiced. However this sort of journalism is determined by your assist — and we have to elevate $23,000 by the tip of the day to maintain Truthout shifting ahead.
We all know not everybody can afford to contribute, however in the event you can, please make a tax-deductible donation to make sure we will maintain publishing the tales that matter most. Each greenback makes a distinction.