Sanders Moves to Limit $76 Billion in “Corporate Welfare” for Microchip Industry

Sen. Bernie Sanders on Tuesday’s amendment would restrict the billions of dollars of federal subsidies and tax credit that Congress is likely to give to the U.S. lucrative microchip industry. The industry has been lobbying vigorously for these handouts.

Sanders’ proposed changes to the CHIPS Act, which cleared a key procedural hurdle Tuesday evening’s Senate vote would ban companies that receive subsidies under the bill, from using the funds for their own stock, offshore U.S. job opportunities, or to stop unionization efforts. The senator argues that no-strings-attached giveaways to the microchip industry would amount to “corporate welfare.”

“If private companies are going to benefit from generous taxpayer subsidies, the financial gains made by these companies must be shared with the American people, not just wealthy shareholders,” Sanders said in a floor speech. “In other words, if microchip companies make a profit as a direct result of these federal grants, the taxpayers of this country have a right to get a reasonable return on that investment.”

The CHIPS Act’s latest version is now at 1,054 pages of legislative textThe total cost of this product is around $250 billion. Tens to billions of these would be used for subsidies to U.S. semiconductor manufacturing. Fresh tax language The bill added benefits to the microchip sector. around $52 billion To $76 billion

Companies like Intel would benefit greatly from such subsidies. took to the airwaves Last week, Congress was asked by the President to pass the microchip legislation.

“Do not go home for August recess until you have passed the CHIPS Act,” Pat Gelsinger, who was one of the highest-paid CEOs The U.S. had $179 million in total compensation last year, according to a CNBC Friday appearance

“I and others in the industry will make investment decisions,” Gelsinger added. “Do you want those investments in the U.S., or are we simply not competitive enough to do them here and we need to go to Europe or Asia?”

Sanders responded directly to Gelsinger’s remarks during his floor speech Tuesday, saying, “I am thankfully not a lawyer, but that sure sounds like extortion to me.”

“What Mr. Gelsinger is saying,” Sanders continued, “is that if you don’t give the industry a blank check — here’s $76 billion, and they want more by the way — despite the needs of the military for advanced microchips… despite the needs of the medical industry for advanced microchips, despite the entire needs of the American economy for advanced microchips, the industry is threatening to abandon this country and move abroad.”

“Mr. Gelsinger says we should stay in session, if necessary, through August in order to pass this legislation,” he added. “Well, I think we might want to stay in session through August. But not necessarily to pass his legislation. Because what I hear from people in Vermont and people all across this country is that the job they want done is not a massive handout to large, profitable corporations.”

As The Daily Poster’s Julia Rock reported Tuesday, “Gelsinger’s company and its well-connected lobbyists are pushing Congress to allow it to potentially use the subsidies” in the CHIPS Act “to put more money into its factories outside of the country.”

“Intel has been one of the bill’s staunchest supporters — and Gelsinger was even invited to President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address to show his support for the subsidies,” Rock noted. “In that speech, Biden said Intel was willing to increase its investment in Ohio’s new chip factory from $20 to $100 billion if Congress passed the CHIPS Act. Intel is now holding that factory hostage.”

In his remarks Tuesday, Sanders likened companies lobbying for passage of the CHIPS Act to “pigs at the trough.”

“They want more and more and more,” the senator said. “Their needs are insatiable.”