Sanders Calls on Congress to End Filibuster If Needed to Protect Abortion Rights

Senator Bernie Sanders said Saturday that it was unacceptable to watch the U.S. Supreme Court end women’s rights to abortion care. He called on his Senate colleagues to urgently end the filibuster, and codify in federal law the protections offered by Roe v. Wade — the historic ruling now under the most severe threat since it was first decided in 1973.

In an email to supporters, the Independent from Vermont and former presidential candidate said a final decision by the court to uphold a Mississippi law that would ban nearly all abortions at just 15 weeks of pregnancy would “mean governments in many states would have the ability to make it virtually impossible for women to access an abortion.”

“The truth is, despite overwhelming opposition from the American people,” Sanders continued, “there is a very strong chance that this conservative Supreme Court will vote to overturn Roe v. Wade.”

Such an outcome is “not acceptable,” he said. “We cannot sit back and allow this Supreme Court to put in jeopardy the privacy rights of all Americans and a woman’s right to control her own body.”

Warning! Roe being overturned “would be disastrous and threaten the very lives of American women — and that’s not an exaggeration,” Sanders said the obvious new reality is that the courts can no longer be trusted to defend a women’s fundamental right to choose.

“So Congress must act,” he said. “We must pass legislation that codifies Roe v. Wadeas the law of this country. And if there aren’t 60 votes to do it, and there are not, we must reform the filibuster to pass it with 50 votes.”

While the U.S. House in September passed the Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA), mostly along party lines, the U.S. Senate remains the only obstacle to establishing a federal law.

Sanders tweeted Saturday that no one in 2021 should be accepting the U.S. moving backwards on fundamental reproductive rights.

In his letter, Sanders said the history of the GOP attack on reproductive rights has not only been relentless for half a century, but their entire assault ranks as “extraordinary hypocrisy”:

Every day, I hear the Senate floor Republicans repeat their right-wing mantra. “Get the government out of people’s lives.” “Get the government off the backs of the American people.” “End the nanny state.” “Let people, not the government, decide what’s good for them.” And on and on the rhetoric goes.

When it comes to ending the disgrace of the United States being the only major country on Earth that does not guarantee health care as a right, their response: “Gotta keep the government out of people’s lives.”

When it comes to stopping the drug companies from being able to charge outrageous prices for the lifesaving medicine people need in this country: “Gotta keep the government out of people’s lives.”

When it comes to asking people who want to buy a handgun or an assault weapon to pass a simple background check: “Gotta keep the government out of people’s lives.”

My Republican colleagues are now proponents of big and oppressive government when it comes down to telling every woman in America what she is allowed or not to do with her body, or whether she can access reproductive healthcare. They believe that women should have the power to decide what is a personal decision for them, regardless of whether it is at the federal, state, or local level.

What hypocrisy!

The Mississippi case was heard by the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this week. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) Many expressed concern at indications that the court’s right-wing justices are more than willing and able to remove protections provided by Roe.

Appearing on MSNBCWarren later in the evening stated that if high court overturns, RoeGOP-controlled states will attempt to end abortion access completely. It will be most devastating for the poorest residents of those states.

“It’s not going to fall on the women who have means,” said Warren. “It’s not going to fall on the women who can buy a plane ticket and go to New York or Massachusetts or California. It’s not going to fall on those women. It’s going to fall on the women who are poor. It’s going to fall on the women who already have children and can’t leave. It’s going o fall on women working three jobs. It’s going to fall on young, young girls who have been molested and may not even know they’re pregnant until deep into the pregnancy. That is who this will fall on.”

Such an outcome, she continued, “is not only taking away a woman`s right to make a decision. This is taking away a woman’s right to continue to build a future for herself.”

Asked if there was a legislative solution, Warren responded, “It is a filibuster problem.”

Like Sanders, Warren cited the existing Women’s Health Protection Act that she said “just says as a matter of federal law the decision to continue a pregnancy is a woman’s decision” and nobody else’s.

“We’ve gotten it through the House,” said Warren. “I believe we could pass it in the Senate but we can`t get 60 votes to get past a filibuster. This is the second time that the filibuster is preventing the willful majority. You know, anything that enjoys support across this nation at the level of 70 percent to 80 percent is something we ought to be able to bring to the floor of the United States Senate and vote on it.”

If WMPA was passed, she added, “the rule of Roe This would be the rule, and not just in Massachusetts, California, or New York. It would be the law across the country. We’ve got to get rid of the filibuster.”