‘Hard man of Brexit’ Steve Baker regrets EU referendum did not require Leave have a 60 per cent ‘supermajority’

Steve Baker, a “Brexit spartan” who voted in opposition to Theresa Could’s take care of the EU on all three events, has stated the vote to depart the EU ought to have required a supermajority of 60 per cent.

The main “Go away” campaigner was a distinguished voice the 2016 referendum, which noticed the voting public again ending EU membership by 52 per to 48 per cent, in addition to throughout the turmoil that adopted.

He has prior to now described himself because the “onerous man of Brexit”.

Reflecting on his function as an arch-rebel within the 2016-2019 interval, Baker just lately informed BBC’s Newsnight programme that it “value me my psychological well being”.


Banner 3

Administration of sport assurance scheme transferring from BGA to Purpose to Maintain


MDU logo

GPs need reassurance on tips on how to assist workers with menopause, says MDU’s HR companion

“November ’21, I had a serious psychological well being disaster. Anxiousness and melancholy. Couldn’t go on. Folks couldn’t inform. Holding these tigers by the tail took its toll. We’re solely human”, he added.

Baker, who now serves as Minister of State on the Northern Eire Workplace, made the feedback a few 60 per cent Brexit supermajority as he recommended a “50 per cent plus one” majority wouldn’t be advisable for a vote on Irish unification.

In accordance with a report within the Belfast Telegraph, Baker informed a gathering of the British-Irish Parliamentary Meeting (BIPA) on Monday that it ought to “most likely ought to have been a supermajority” of a minimum of 60 per cent to depart the bloc.

He added that not having the brink had prompted critical political “bother”.

He stated: “One remorse is it most likely ought to have been a supermajority.

“That’s an enormous factor for me to say – as a result of if it had been a supermajority we’d have misplaced and we’d nonetheless be in. However the cause I say that’s if we’d needed to have 60 per cent, everyone would have abided by the outcome.”

“If it had been a 60-40 outcome, it’s inconceivable to me that we might have had all the political issue which adopted from members of parliament particularly refusing to simply accept the outcome.”

Baker then cautioned in opposition to a “50 per cent plus one” end in any potential Irish unification vote. “Would anybody right here severely need a 50 per cent plus one united Eire end in Northern Eire?”.

“Simply mirror on the difficulty we had from working a 50 per cent plus one referendum in the UK and ask your self whether or not you actually need that bother in Northern Eire – and I don’t”.

Baker, a former chair of the European Analysis Group of Eurosceptic Conservatives, backed Rishi Sunak’s renegotiation of the Northern Eire Protocol, the so-called “Windsor Framework”, handed in March of this 12 months. 

In doing so, Baker invoked the ire of his former colleagues within the ERG and was kicked out of one of many group’s WhatsApp chats. 

It got here after Baker apologised for his as soon as “ferocious” stance on negotiations with the EU which he stated didn’t at all times encourage Eire to belief the UK authorities.

Politics.co.uk is the UK’s main digital-only political web site, offering complete protection of UK politics. Subscribe to our every day publication right here.