Free Speech Watchdogs Condemn Elon Musk for Suspending Journalists From Twitter

Twitter’s CEO is dealing with backlash from press freedom and civil liberties teams over the choice.

Twitter CEO Elon Musk, a self-proclaimed free speech absolutist, suspended quite a lot of journalists from the social media platform on Thursday in what the ACLU condemned as “an assault on free expression” that must be reversed.

Musk justified his choice by claiming these suspended — together with Drew Harwell of The Washington Publish, Micah Lee of The Intercept, Ryan Mac of The New York Instances, and Matt Binder of Mashable — shared real-time particulars about his location, an accusation stemming from the journalists’ reporting on a Twitter account that tracked the movements of the billionaire’s non-public jet.

That account and the particular person behind it, a college student, have been suspended and Musk says he intends to take authorized motion, though the flight info was primarily based on publicly available data.

“Criticizing me all day lengthy is completely high-quality,” Musk tweeted late Thursday, “however doxxing my real-time location and endangering my household will not be.”

Following the suspensions of journalists, which had been carried out with out discover or quick clarification, the Publish reported that “not one of the tweets from suspended reporters” that it reviewed “revealed the situation of Musk or his household.”

Musk later insisted that even a lot as sharing a hyperlink to the flight-tracking account in the midst of reporting quantities to a violation of Twitter’s newly amended policy towards sharing an individual’s “reside location info.”

As Musk confronted backlash from press freedom and civil liberties teams over the choice, he posted a ballot on Twitter asking customers when he ought to unsuspend the journalists’ accounts. When a plurality of respondents stated the accounts must be restored “now,” Musk tweeted: “Sorry, too many choices. Will redo ballot.”

Jameel Jaffer, government director of the Knight First Modification Institute at Columbia College, told NPR that “Musk suspending journalists’ accounts is petty and vindictive and completely disgraceful — and particularly so as a result of Musk has styled himself, nevertheless absurdly, as a champion of free speech.”

The Committee to Shield Journalists, a watchdog group that defends press freedom worldwide, said in a press release that it’s “involved about information studies that journalists who’ve coated current developments involving Twitter and its proprietor, Elon Musk, have had their accounts on the platform suspended.”

“If confirmed as retaliation for his or her work, this could be a severe violation of journalists’ proper to report the information with out worry of reprisal,” the group added.

Musk’s transfer additionally drew consideration and criticism from lawmakers.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who has confronted death threats and different types of harassment, tweeted that she understands “feeling unsafe, however descending into abuse of energy [and] erratically banning journalists solely will increase the depth round you.”

“You’re a public determine. An especially controversial and highly effective one,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote. “Take a beat and lay off the proto-fascism. Perhaps attempt placing down your cellphone.”

Edward Snowden, who uncovered mass surveillance by the highly effective U.S. Nationwide Safety Company and is now living in Russia underneath menace of imprisonment in his house nation, weighed in on the suspensions Friday morning, writing that he’s “considerably extra sympathetic to Elon Musk’s concern about loopy folks exhibiting up on the door than the common particular person as a result of, properly, take a look at my life, however c’mon, man.”

“You’re a public determine able of energy in a world the place even regular individuals are continuously tracked,” Snowden added.

Pal, we’d like your help.

In a world outlined by company media, Truthout is radically completely different: We don’t have promoting companions, sponsors, or a billionaire proprietor. No business forces affect what we publish, so we by no means should compromise our requirements, and may stay accountable solely to you, our group of readers. 

However our dedication to transparency, collectivity, and accessibility goes even additional: We don’t have a paywall, we don’t require a subscription, and we don’t restrict the variety of articles you’ll be able to learn. Why? As a result of we don’t imagine in proscribing entry to the reality. 

Producing moral, trustworthy, not-for-profit journalism takes time, intention and talent — and requires vital monetary help. To maintain us sturdy going into 2023, we have to elevate $150,000 by the top of December. 

Will you help our trailblazing efforts in impartial information by making a tax-deductible end-of-year reward?  

Donate Now