Brother of World Cup Whistleblower Imprisoned in Qatar Speaks Out

Picture Credit score: Courtesy of Ziad Ibhais

Because the world’s consideration turns to the World Cup remaining on Sunday between Argentina and France, we have a look at the case of imprisoned World Cup whistleblower Abdullah Ibhais, a former communications director for Qatar’s 2022 World Cup organizers, who has been imprisoned since November 2019. Ibhais, a Jordanian nationwide, was given a five-year sentence in Qatar on what his household says are trumped-up expenses after he raised concern over working circumstances for migrant employees who’d gone on strike over months of unpaid wages — together with employees constructing stadiums for the video games. Ibhais’s sentence was later lowered to a few years, however his household not too long ago mentioned in an open letter that he was subjected to torture after he contributed footage to the ITV documentary Qatar: State of Worry? Ibhais’s household has additionally blasted FIFA, calling it complicit in his imprisonment. For extra, we converse with Abdullah’s brother Ziad Ibhais and Nick McGeehan, co-director and co-founder of the human rights group FairSquare, the place he advocates for migrant employees.


It is a rush transcript. Copy is probably not in its remaining type.

AMY GOODMAN: That is Democracy Now!,, The Battle and Peace Report. I’m Amy Goodman, with Nermeen Shaikh.

As France and Argentina put together to face off Sunday within the World Cup finals in Qatar, we finish immediately’s present trying on the case of imprisoned World Cup whistleblower Abdullah Ibhais. He’s the previous communications director for Qatar’s 2022 World Cup organizers, the Supreme Committee for Supply and Legacy. He’s been imprisoned in Qatar since November 2019. His household says he’s been held in solitary confinement and tortured in a Qatari jail. In 2021, Abdullah Ibhais was sentenced to 5 years in jail on what his household says are trumped-up expenses, after he interviewed migrant employees who had gone on strike over months of unpaid wages, together with employees constructing stadiums for the video games. His sentence was later lowered to a few years. Abdullah Ibhais’s household has blasted the FIFA soccer federation, calling it complicit in Abdullah’s imprisonment.

We’re joined now by Abdullah’s brother Ziad Ibhais and Nick McGeehan, co-director and co-founder of the human rights group FairSquare, the place he advocates for migrant employees. He was beforehand a senior researcher at Human Rights Watch. Nick is becoming a member of us from Good, France. Ziad is becoming a member of us from Amman, Jordan.

We welcome you each to Democracy Now! Ziad, let’s start with you. Inform us about what occurred to your brother Abdullah. Speak about his interviewing employees, videoing their circumstances in Qatar, and what occurred.

ZIAD IBHAIS: Thanks, Amy.

It began on the 4th of August, 2019, when employees, migrant employees, took to the streets of Doha due to the delayed funds. And, you realize, this isn’t a selection individuals would go for or go for in Doha. So, they had been determined. They had been 4 months not paid. They don’t have anything to maintain them. In order that they went on the streets.

After all, it got here to the priority of the Supreme Committee, they usually began speaking about that. Abdullah felt skeptical about what was being mentioned by his fellows within the Division of Employees’ Welfare, and wished to verify by himself. So he went to the strike scene. And there, he met with employees. He discovered that there isn’t a electrical energy within the camp. It was in the course of Doha’s summer time; it was on the 4th of August. He discovered them with out sufficient meals, with out ingesting water and 4 months not paid. Nearly 200 employees had been working within the stadiums of the Instructional Metropolis and Al Bayt Stadium.

So, he went again to his superiors, and he despatched these movies and recordings to them to verify that the state of affairs shouldn’t be mounted. He was requested by the Supreme Committee’s secretary normal, Hassan al-Thawadi, to place out a press release to disclaim that these individuals had been working within the stadiums of the World Cup. After this, after happening website, Abdullah mentioned, “We will by no means deny this. It’s higher for us to confess this, to repair it, after which to say that we’ve mounted the state of affairs, we’ve paid these wages to the employees.” Hassan al-Thawadi thought in any other case, nevertheless. They insisted on what he known as placing a spin on it, placing a story on it, and saying that this has nothing to do with the Supreme Committee.

After that, one month later, an inner investigation began towards Abdullah, after which it was handed to the authorities. This investigation raised very critical allegations towards Abdullah that he was conspiring with a Saudi associate to place the social media of the World Cup within the fingers of what Qatar at the moment used to name the blockade states, and for taking a bribe in return of awarding the tender for a Turkish firm. So, this raised a priority within the police, and Abdullah was despatched to state safety police.

He was denied the best to see a lawyer. He was interrogated with no lawyer. And truly, all of the interrogation was about, to make him signal a ready-made confession. He was not requested what occurred. They advised him, “We all know what you probably did. All what it’s important to hold your security is to signal this.” He was threatened with six months’ imprisonment with out seeing his household or a lawyer. He was threatened with bodily violence and torture. And if he didn’t signal, he was advised that “We’ll ship you to state safety jail, the place they know properly how one can get a confession out of you.” So, Abdullah broke and signed this confession.

After that, 35 days later, he was launched on bail. The case stayed for one 12 months untouched. Throughout that one 12 months, he was denied any info to the case. He didn’t know what he’s accused of. We didn’t know what’s the case towards Abdullah.

After that, it went to a few ranges of court docket. All three ranges of court docket refused to look into Abdullah’s retraction of the confession. They refused to analyze this confession. They refused to power the Supreme Committee to current the claimed proof. The Supreme Committee claimed that that they had recordings and movies of Abdullah conspiring with this Saudi man, however they by no means offered them in court docket. It was offered — it was by no means seen or checked. So, all three courts maintained that they maintain to the confession, even when Abdullah retracted it. It was not supported by any sort of bodily proof. And the third court docket, which took the case, which selected to take the case, on the seventh of November, because the World Cup opening was approaching, Abdullah didn’t attend. His lawyer didn’t attend. We weren’t knowledgeable that there’s a listening to. All the best way, Abdullah received an opportunity, within the three courts, to defend himself for 5 minutes. All the prospect that his lawyer received within the three courts is 5 minutes to current his case. And on a regular basis, he was silenced. So, mainly, it is a authorized facade to a political determination that Abdullah ought to be silenced and stay in jail.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: Nick McGeehan, might you clarify how FIFA is immediately implicated in what’s occurred to Abdullah, and in addition how his case was dropped at your consideration, the eye of your group, FairSquare?

NICK McGEEHAN: Yeah. I imply, FIFA could be very closely implicated on this. As Ziad defined, FIFA’s companions in Qatar are the Supreme Committee, who submitted this police report back to the Qatari authorities that in the end put Abdullah in hurt’s means. It’s very clear from the proof and evaluation of the case paperwork and the judgments that he was subjected to a deeply unfair trial. There’s no proof towards him apart from this confession that Ziad mentioned. And so, Human Rights Watch and FairSquare had been two of the organizations who pressed FIFA to demand that Abdullah get a good trial — not that they are saying he ought to be launched, however simply that he get a good trial. And FIFA hasn’t carried out that, which simply looks like an appalling abdication of duty on their half.

When it comes to how the case got here to our consideration, Abdullah emailed lots of people concerning the case. I consider it was September 2021. I keep in mind instantly getting again in contact with him and having a cellphone name with him.

And what was outstanding about Abdullah’s story wasn’t simply the allegations he needed to make, which had been explosive, clearly, however the truth that he had a lot proof to assist them. What’s fascinating about this case is there are two variations of occasions. There’s Abdullah’s model of occasions: I’m the sufferer of a malicious prosecution primarily based on what I did inside the Supreme Committee. He offered lots of proof to again that up. And there’s the Qatari model of occasions: He’s responsible of bribery, in relation to some form of tender. And there’s simply no proof to again that up, they usually haven’t produced any.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: And what are you demanding from the Qatari authorities? Have you ever acquired any response from them in any respect?

NICK McGEEHAN: No, not likely. What you discover with the Supreme Committee, which is the World Cup organizers, is that they do lots of briefing behind the scenes. So, whoever is on this story, journalists usually, they’ll go on the cellphone to them, speaking to them. However the Qatari authorities have a tendency not to answer direct communication, and there’s been no direct communication right here. The personal briefings are all to the impact that Abdullah is responsible, Abdullah is to not be trusted, Abdullah was no buddy of migrant employees, and there’s proof to assist these allegations. However while you have a look at the court docket judgment or while you ask anybody to offer some proof to assist the allegations towards him, then you definitely discover that there’s none.

AMY GOODMAN: What proof do you’ve, Ziad or Nick, that Abdullah is being tortured? And, Ziad, when did you final converse to him? And what has been the response of the international locations which can be concerned with the FIFA soccer, I imply, responding to what’s occurring to him proper there in Qatar?

ZIAD IBHAIS: I final spoke to Abdullah on the fifth of December, once I knew the circumstances of his solitary confinement. He advised me that he was put in solitary confinement on the 2nd of November, because the World Cup approached. And he was — the solitary confinement was all darkish, and the central air con of the jail was directed towards him. He was sleep disadvantaged for 96 hours constantly. So, it occurred after, after the decision befell, even earlier than the final verdict. So, if he’s serving his time in jail, what’s the necessity for this type of torture, if he’s to not be silenced? Instantly after he was taken out of solitary confinement, his case, the subsequent day, was despatched to the Courtroom of Cassation with no discover, a previous discover. So, it’s clear that there’s an intention to deprive Abdullah from getting ready his protection, to deprive him from being in court docket, and deprive his lawyer from being in court docket. And these are — this stuff, these developments, stand for themselves and converse for themselves.

Truly, we tried to succeed in out to many international locations taking part, or we thought will likely be taking part, within the World Cup. Most of them didn’t take Abdullah’s case critically. There was little concern about his case or about migrant employees, to my understanding. The priority was, is that the event has to happen. So, we virtually received no replies, besides from some federations, like Australia and Norway, at a sure level. These are the one solutions we received from international locations. Aside from that, it was two Norwegian journalists who had been detained once they got here to see Abdullah on the fifteenth of November, 2021. This introduced the federal government of Norway into the case. And after detention of the 2 journalists — they had been deported from the nation, really — the Norway authorities summoned the Qatari ambassador in Norway.

AMY GOODMAN: I wish to play a clip of a brief documentary launched by Human Rights Watch that includes migrant employees and their households from Nepal demanding compensation for the abuses and sudden deaths whereas constructing and getting ready for this 12 months’s World Cup in Qatar. That is Hari, a former migrant employee in Qatar.

HARI: [translated] After I went to Lusail in Qatar, there was nothing. There wasn’t even a single constructing. Now there are towers in every single place. We constructed these towers. Within the warmth, we labored out of compulsion with face covers. We had been drenched in sweat. We poured water, sweat, from our footwear. Even in that warmth, we labored laborious.

My son didn’t acknowledge me once I first got here from Qatar to Nepal. My son’s intention is to play soccer, so I went to observe him play for little bit. I met my son solely 5 instances within the 14 years I used to be away. I used to cry and really feel unhealthy that I needed to keep away from youngsters for work.

AMY GOODMAN: A multicountry investigation by The Guardian reported that between 2010 and 2020, for that decade, virtually 6,500 migrant employees from India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka have died in Qatar. Nick, I wished to ask you, as you look, total, at this concern, and because the FIFA soccer goes to finish on Sunday, irrespective of who wins, what you suppose will come of the eye paid to employees’ rights in Qatar? Is Qatar altering its insurance policies, to not point out different nations?

NICK McGEEHAN: Yeah. I imply, on the one hand, there may be now this consciousness of this downside. I’ve been engaged on this concern for practically 20 years, and once I began, no one actually knew about these abuses. Nobody had heard of the kafala system. And it simply wasn’t a problem in any respect. Qatar has modified that. Qatar has develop into a lightning rod for deal with this concern and criticism of this concern. And that has led to some modifications — on paper, at the least. You recognize, there have been reforms to the kafala system, a authorized abolition, in impact.

However, sadly, that hasn’t actually been complemented by the mandatory political will to make that efficient. And as your piece rightly recognized, you realize, it’s come far too late for all these households who’ve misplaced members of the family in circumstances which have simply not been defined to them. So, I have a tendency to have a look at these super human harms and the appalling impression this had on individuals just like the household of the person in your piece, and I discover it laborious to attract specific optimism from what we’ve acquired —

AMY GOODMAN: Nick, earlier than we go — we solely have 10 seconds — I wish to ask Ziad: Has the Jordanian authorities intervened in your brother’s behalf?

ZIAD IBHAIS: No, sadly. They simply visited him as soon as in jail. And after that, they refrained. They by no means intervened on the case.

AMY GOODMAN: And when do you anticipate him to be launched?

ZIAD IBHAIS: Properly, I hope he will likely be launched quickly, as a result of with this stress, the Qataris may attain an understanding that Abdullah is changing into a burden, and he’s in jail for nothing improper he did, just for a political determination. And we hope it will likely be quickly.

AMY GOODMAN: Ziad Ibhais, I wish to thanks a lot for being with us, brother of Abdullah, who’s in jail in Qatar for exposing employee abuses, and Nick McGeehan, co-director and co-founder of the human rights group FairSquare. I’m Amy Goodman, with Nermeen Shaikh.

Buddy, we want your assist.

In a world outlined by company media, Truthout is radically completely different: We don’t have promoting companions, sponsors, or a billionaire proprietor. No business forces affect what we publish, so we by no means need to compromise our requirements, and might stay accountable solely to you, our group of readers. 

However our dedication to transparency, collectivity, and accessibility goes even additional: We don’t have a paywall, we don’t require a subscription, and we don’t restrict the variety of articles you’ll be able to learn. Why? As a result of we don’t consider in limiting entry to the reality. 

Producing moral, trustworthy, not-for-profit journalism takes time, intention and ability — and requires vital monetary assist. To maintain us robust going into 2023, we have to increase $150,000 by the tip of December. 

Will you assist our trailblazing efforts in unbiased information by making a tax-deductible end-of-year reward?  

Donate Now