After 41 Years in Prison, Mumia Abu-Jamal May Finally Get a Chance for New Trial

A part of the Sequence

Human Rights and World Wrongs

Award-winning journalist and writer Mumia Abu-Jamal has been in jail for 41 years in a case infused with racism. The 68-year-old is a former Black Panther and the writer of a dozen books, together with the celebrated Dwell from Demise Row. After his 1982 conviction within the killing of police officer Daniel Faulkner, Abu-Jamal was sentenced to loss of life. In 2011, his sentence was decreased to life with out the opportunity of parole. Abu-Jamal has a severe coronary heart situation and different life-threatening well being issues.

Faulkner stopped Abu-Jamal’s youthful brother William Cook dinner on the morning of December 9, 1981. Abu-Jamal, who was driving a taxi, coincidentally drove by and got here to his brother’s help. Following a shootout, Faulkner was shot and killed. Abu-Jamal was shot within the abdomen.

On December 16, Decide Lucretia Clemons within the Philadelphia Courtroom of Widespread Pleas will determine whether or not Abu-Jamal will obtain a brand new trial. His attorneys, Judith Ritter, Samuel Spital and Bret Grote, argue that if the jury had heard newly found proof that was withheld from him and never offered at his homicide trial, Abu-Jamal wouldn’t have been convicted. On October 26, Clemons indicated her intent to disclaim Abu-Jamal’s petition for a brand new trial however she’s going to make a remaining resolution on December 16 after listening to from the events within the case.

Prosecution Did not Give Defendant Exonerating Proof in Violation of Brady v. Maryland

In 2018, one month after his election as Philadelphia district lawyer, Larry Krasner reported discovering six file packing containers of paperwork that had by no means been disclosed to Abu-Jamal’s legal professionals. They have been labeled “Mumia” or “Abu-Jamal.” The protection first obtained them in January 2019.

The newly found packing containers contained materials proof suggesting that one of many authorities’s star witnesses had been supplied a payoff for his testimony, and the opposite eyewitness to the capturing had been promised leniency in her pending felony instances in trade for her testimony. There was no different proof instantly connecting Abu-Jamal to the killing.

These packing containers additionally held the prosecutor’s handwritten notes indicating he was discriminatorily excluding Black individuals from Abu-Jamal’s jury.

Since Abu-Jamal’s homicide trial, flaws and inconsistencies have come to mild resulting in widespread calls around the globe for his launch. His case has turn into a trigger celebre, emblematic of racism within the felony authorized system.

“It shocks the conscience that in a post-George Floyd world, Abu-Jamal received’t get aid. He was overwhelmed inside an inch of his life by police after having been shot within the abdomen by Officer Faulkner,” Johanna Fernández, an affiliate professor of U.S. historical past, wrote to Truthout in an electronic mail.

“The prosecutor bribed an affidavit out of star witness Robert Chobert, who was driving with two DUIs, no license and had been convicted of throwing a Molotov Cocktail right into a schoolyard. The decide was overheard saying by a court docket stenographer, ‘I’m going to assist them (the jury) fry the nigger,’” Fernández, who’s the author and govt producer of the movie Justice on Trial: The Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal, added. “The one factor Mumia is responsible of is having survived an encounter with the soiled Philly cops, below investigation on the time by the DOJ for brutality, corruption and tampering with proof to acquire convictions.”

The Supreme Courtroom held in Brady v. Maryland that when the prosecution suppresses proof favorable to the accused, it violates due course of if the proof is materials to guilt or punishment, whatever the good religion or unhealthy religion of the prosecutor. There’s a Brady violation when there’s a “cheap chance” that if the proof had been disclosed to the protection the results of the trial would have been completely different.

The Star Prosecution Witness Was Apparently Supplied a Payoff for His Testimony

One of many new paperwork was a letter from witness Robert Chobert to the prosecutor Joseph McGill that steered a payoff in trade for his testimony towards Abu-Jamal. “I’ve been calling you to seek out out concerning the cash personal [sic] to me. Do you want me to signal something. How lengthy will it take to get it,” Chobert wrote.

Of their petition, Abu-Jamal’s attorneys argued that this letter suggests Chobert “understood there to be some prior settlement or understanding between himself and the prosecution, such that the prosecution ‘owed’ him cash for his testimony.”

The newly found letter corroborates Chobert’s trial testimony that the prosecutor supplied to reinstate his suspended taxi drivers license if he retracted his declare that the shooter, who didn’t appear like Abu-Jamal, had run from the scene.

There’s a cheap chance that however for the prosecution’s failure to provide this letter to the protection, Abu-Jamal wouldn’t have been convicted of homicide.

The Different Witness to the Taking pictures Seemingly Acquired Leniency for Her Testimony

Cynthia White was the one different witness moreover Chobert who testified that she noticed Abu-Jamal shoot Faulkner. A intercourse employee who was susceptible to coercion, White was additionally apparently promised inducements for her testimony. On the time of the trial, she was in jail in Massachusetts and there have been 5 felony instances pending towards her.

The newly found packing containers included letters from the district lawyer’s workplace to prosecutors handing White’s 5 present instances. These letters, in line with Abu-Jamal’s attorneys, “reveal a concerted effort by Mr. McGill and a number of other Philadelphia D.A. Unit Chiefs to convey Ms. White again from Massachusetts, safe an early trial date in an effort to expedite her launch, and in the end enable her instances to be dismissed for lack of prosecution.”

Abu-Jamal’s legal professionals maintain that this favorable remedy was calculated to make “life simpler for her in trade for her testimony towards Abu-Jamal.”

As well as, Yvette Williams, additionally a former intercourse employee, swore in a 2002 affidavit, “I used to be in jail with Cynthia White in December of 1981 after Police Officer Daniel Faulkner was shot and killed. Cynthia White informed me the police have been making her lie and say she noticed Mr. Jamal shoot Officer Faulkner when she actually didn’t see who did it.”

There’s a cheap chance that Abu-Jamal wouldn’t have suffered a homicide conviction if the prosecution had offered these letters to the protection.

Furthermore, if the letters relating to inducements to each Chobert and White had been disclosed, there’s a fair higher likelihood that Abu-Jamal would have been acquitted of homicide. They have been the one witnesses who testified that Abu-Jamal was the shooter.

Decide Clemons wrote in her discover of intent to dismiss that any Brady error was not materials (prejudicial) as a result of Abu-Jamal would have been convicted anyway. Abu-Jamal’s legal professionals responded that the prosecutor relied closely on the credulity of Chobert’s testimony in his closing argument. In addition they responded that though White was impeached at trial together with her quite a few prior felony costs, she was not confronted with the prosecutor’s promise of leniency (which the protection didn’t find out about on the time of trial).

The Prosecutor Indicated Intent to Exclude Black Jurors, in Violation of Batson v. Kentucky

In Batson v. Kentucky, the Supreme Courtroom held {that a} Black defendant is denied equal safety when members of his race have been purposefully excluded from the jury. The defendant should make a prima facie case by displaying that the prosecutor exercised his problem on the idea of race. Then the prosecutor should current a race-neutral cause from excluding the juror. The court docket then decides whether or not the defendant has demonstrated purposeful discrimination.

The newly found packing containers contained prosecutor McGill’s handwritten notes which present that he marked a big “B” subsequent to potential jurors who have been Black. Throughout voir dire, 10 of the 15 individuals McGill struck from the jury have been Black. He thus prevented 71 p.c of potential Black jurors from serving on Abu-Jamal’s jury.

It’s “not shocking” that McGill used 10 of his 15 challenges to exclude certified Black individuals from Abu-Jamal’s jury, lawyer Heidi Boghosian, former govt director of the Nationwide Attorneys Guild, wrote in an electronic mail to Truthout. “Philadelphia has a deep-rooted Batson downside, or racial discrimination in jury choice,” Boghosian wrote. “From 1977-1986, its district lawyer struck 58 p.c of potential Black jurors, in contrast with 22 p.c of white ones. Within the murder instances that McGill tried from September 1981 to October 1983, he peremptorily challenged African American jurors 8.47 instances greater than non-black ones.”

“The newly found proof helps a Batson declare,” Boghosian stated. “It have to be reviewed, not solely in equity to Abu-Jamal, but additionally to redress town’s racially discriminatory custom.”

Clemons wrote in her discover of intent to dismiss that Abu-Jamal’s Batson declare was waived as a result of he didn’t object at trial and on direct enchantment. Abu-Jamal’s attorneys responded that his Batson declare was not waived as a result of it was based mostly on newly found proof. In addition they wrote that the brand new McGill notes have been related to his purposeful mind-set in exercising his challenges to exclude Blacks from the jury.

UN Specialists Categorical “Severe Concern” About Racial Discrimination in Abu-Jamal’s Case

In 2000, Amnesty International discovered “that quite a few features of this case clearly failed to satisfy minimal worldwide requirements safeguarding the equity of authorized proceedings,” and subsequently “the pursuits of justice would greatest be served by the granting of a brand new trial to Mumia Abu-Jamal.”

Twenty-two years later, UN consultants are expressing “severe concern” about racial discrimination in Abu-Jamal’s case. “The United Nations Working Group of Specialists on Individuals of African Descent (WGEPAD) has adopted Mumia’s case for years and has simply filed an amicus temporary for his listening to,” Julia Wright, elder daughter of famend writer Richard Wright, informed Truthout. “Given situations of the pervasive systemic racism tainting the case to this present day, these consultants word that worldwide human rights legislation requires jurists to take duty for ongoing results of racial discrimination, even many years later.” Julia Wright is founding father of the Mumia Well being Committee, for whom she liaises with the WGEPAD on the United Nations.

In line with WGEPAD’s amicus temporary, “a big proportion of the law enforcement officials concerned in gathering proof and presenting the case have been investigated and finally convicted and jailed on costs together with corruption and proof tampering, data that was unavailable to the jury on the time it was assessing the credibility, tendency towards bias, and reliability of those officers.”

It took 37 years for the prosecution to show over exculpatory proof to Abu-Jamal’s authorized staff. If progressive prosecutor Larry Krasner had not been elected district lawyer of Philadelphia, the six packing containers of proof would nonetheless be accumulating mud. It’s excessive time to grant Mumia Abu-Jamal a brand new trial wherein a jury that hasn’t been chosen in an overtly racist method can hear all of the proof.

Buddy, we’d like your help.

In a world outlined by company media, Truthout is radically completely different: We don’t have promoting companions, sponsors, or a billionaire proprietor. No business forces affect what we publish, so we by no means need to compromise our requirements, and may stay accountable solely to you, our neighborhood of readers. 

However our dedication to transparency, collectivity, and accessibility goes even additional: We don’t have a paywall, we don’t require a subscription, and we don’t restrict the variety of articles you may learn. Why? As a result of we don’t imagine in proscribing entry to the reality. 

Producing moral, trustworthy, not-for-profit journalism takes time, intention and talent — and requires vital monetary help. To maintain us sturdy going into 2023, we have to increase $150,000 by the tip of December. 

Will you help our trailblazing efforts in impartial information by making a tax-deductible end-of-year present?  

Donate Now