Why Stop At Removing The Judge In The Stanford Rape Case… THIS Presidential Candidate Needs To Go Too

June 10, 2016Jun 10, 2016

Much has been said about Hillary Clinton’s blatant lies, numerous scandals and criminal investigations that follow the Democratic nominee as she tries to ascend to the highest office in America.

However, there is one thing that the media is oddly silent about. The entire media throughout the country and all of the social justice warriors on Facebook are clamoring to have the judge in the Stanford rape case recalled and banished from office.

While they proceed in punishing the judge who gave the student a lenient sentence, the same people will most likely vote to give the presidency to a former lawyer who successfully got a rapist off the hook for his crimes against a 12 year old girl. That former lawyer is Hillary Clinton.

In 1975, Hillary represented Thomas Alfred Taylor, a 41 year-old accused of raping a 12 year-old girl.  According to ABC, Hillary had discussed the case in the 1980’s and knew that the man she was representing was guilty. “He took a lie detector test!” Hillary said on audio tape in the 80’s. “I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs.”

During the trial, Hillary had alleged that the 12 year-old girl often sought out older men, as if that would somehow make the man’s actions justifiable. “It’s not true,” the victim said. “I never sought out older men. I was raped.”

Despite believing that the man was guilty, Hillary was able to get the man off on a lesser charge. Instead of first-degree rape, he was accused of unlawful fondling of a minor under the age of 14 and sentenced to only 1 year in county jail and 4 years of probation.

In addition to Hillary helping to destroy a 12 year-old girl’s life, she is often accused of having belittled the many women who accused her husband Bill of sexual misconduct against them.

Is Hillary a person you want in the oval office?