TV Networks’ Coverage of Freedom Convoy Lacks ‘So-Called’ Objectivity

Something caught my ear in the car, listening to a radio simulcast of the Feb. 21 “PBS NewsHour.”

Anchor Judy Woodruff dryly reported that “Canadian police have arrested more than 190 protesters and issued 389 charges in connection with the so-called Freedom Convoy.”

The “so-called Freedom Convoy.”

It’s a journalistic term, the use of which can be interpreted as distancing themselves from something that’s not true. After 9/11, we heard about the “so-called War on Terror.” Democrats hated that term. Dan Rather used to get out the 10-foot pole and report on “the Republican political lobbying group that calls itself, quote, the ‘Christian Coalition.’” This could be described as “so-called journalism.”

So, I decided to put this term “so-called Freedom Convoy” into the Nexis news database to see how often it cropped up on television. The answer was very surprising.

It started as soon as the protests started on Jan. 29. CNN’s Jim Acosta was barking: “Canadian officials say they were sickened to see protesters dancing on that country’s Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. This all began as the so-called Freedom Convoy of truckers who drove across the country for several days before arriving in Ottawa yesterday … .”

If Acosta thinks it’s a disreputable protest, then it’s probably about “freedom.” This is the same operative who fought with White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany in June of 2020, suggesting Trump rallies were COVID-19 superspreaders.

When she suggested the media were incoherent, that they didn’t feel Black Lives Matter protests were unhealthy, he lamely shot back: “But these are protesters protesting against injustice, against racism and police brutality. This is a rally, a political rally.”

Liberal protests are for justice, so they weren’t superspreaders. It’s “science.”

CNN hated Canadian protesters. On Feb. 8 at midnight, anchor John Vause wasn’t holding back. “Freedom from truth, freedom from civility, freedom from reality. Canada’s so-called Freedom Convoy. The truckers’ protest over all pandemic restrictions galvanizes far-right groups worldwide.”

It turns out that CNN hated the Canadian protests so much that I found the term “so-called Freedom Convoy” used in 62 different hours of CNN coverage. They were 12 in total on February 12, and they were present for half the time of the day.

Let’s stipulate that CNN offers pretty much its entire day of transcripts for the database, and plenty of these were in the overnight hours, when the news is more international.

This term was used by every other liberal network, but less often. MSNBC used it only four times in the Nexis sampling (but they spent less time on the system). It was used by ABC on six programs, CBS on five and NBC on four. PBS only used it once.

On MSNBC’s “Deadline White House,” substitute host Alicia Menendez warned of “the so-called Freedom Convoy, crippling the U.S. and Canadian economy, raising security alarms about copycat protests. So, why is the U.S. right wing cheering them on?”

Now try to imagine the sometimes-violent rioting and looting in the summer of 2020, which the networks described with positive terms, like “racial reckoning.”

Would anyone ever refer to “so-called Black Lives Matter protests”? I searched CNN for “so-called Black Lives Matter,” and there was one record. It was live coverage from the 2020 Republican National Convention, Wednesday night, August 26. It wasn’t an interview, just an open mic.

Jack Brewer of Black Voices for Trump was saying the media “ignore the so-called Black Lives Matter organization that openly, on their website, called for the destruction of the nuclear family.”

CNN sounded a lot like White Voices for Trudeau on this protest story.

COPYRIGHT 2022. CREATORS.COM

The Daily Signal offers a variety perspectives. This article is not meant to represent the views of The Heritage Foundation.


You have an opinion on this article? Please email to share your thoughts. [email protected] and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Be sure to include the article’s URL, headline, and your name.