Tristan Thompson Says Relationship W/ His Alleged 3rd Baby Mama, Maralee Nichols, ‘Was Based On Sex’ & They Would Only Communicate Via Snapchat



Tristan Thompson, Maralee Nicks

Tristan Thompson Claims His Relationship W/ His Alleged 3rd Baby Mama, Maralee Nichols, ‘Was Based On Sex’ & They Would Only Communicate Via Snapchat

It seems almost like Tristan ThompsonSnapchat is attracting new users.

As reported previously, personal trainers were available earlier in the month. Maralee Nicks, 31 gave birth to Tristan Thompson’s30 year old alleged third child. Initial reports stated that the couple’s child was conceived in March. Tristan Thompson’sBirthday party celebration. At the time, the Sacramento Kings’ player was still dating reality star/mother of his 2nd child, Khloe Kardashian, 37. Maralee NicksShe has already taken legal action against her rumored father and filed a lawsuit to recover child support.

Khloe Kardashian and Tristan Thompson are Maralee Nichols

Recently, newly obtained court documents were made available. Tristan ThompsonHe revealed that Snapchat was the way he communicated with him Maralee Nicks. According to a December 8th declaration, Thompson admitted,

“As I stated, our relationship was based on sex. We would not have seen each other in Houston if we were not going to have sex.”

“We did not have any dates in the traditional sense at any time; there were no dining at restaurants, going to movies, traveling or any other indicia of a normalized relationship. There was only Snapchats of ‘where’ and ‘what time’ we would hook up and what hotels would be used.”

He continued,

“We only communicated via the Snapchat application. My username on Snapchat has always been ‘blkjesus00.”

He continued,

“After a Snapchat message, the message is automatically deleted. If one of us did something to save the message, the other would be notified. Petitioner never saved a message I sent. Petitioner never confirmed that I was notified of her retaining messages.”

Tristan Thompson

Additionally, ThompsonThe couple also claims that the baby was not conceived in California, but Texas. Because it is important to know where the baby was conceived, Nicole is granted paternity in California she’ll reportedly receive more in child support. According to NicoleShe met ThompsonCalifornia. They were together for five months, before she became pregnant. ThompsonShe offered $75,000 to have an abortion.

However, Thompson’sCourt filings state otherwise. He stated that

“Contrary to Petitioner’s many inferences in her declaration, we did not have a serious ongoing relationship.”

“We saw each other sporadically between December 2020 and March 13, 2021 and did not have sexual intercourse in California during that time”

He continued,

“Petitioner told me that she had been involved with other athletes and understood the limitations of our relationship; to-wit, that we might see each other on a sporadic basis for consensual casual sex only.”

He continued,

??”I only recall that Petitioner and I had sexual relations in March of 2021 and at no other time in 2021.”

“Petitioner constantly used the term ‘hook up’ to describe our relationship which was the reality. I am certain that if the child is deemed to be my child that the only date of conception was March 13, 2021, because it was my birthday.”


What are your thoughts? Comment below!