On Counterterrorism, Is Biden ‘Over the Horizon’ or in Over His Head?

President Joe Biden announced on April 14, 2021 that he would withdraw all U.S. military personnel from Afghanistan, in accordance with an agreement he had made with Donald Trump.

“We went to Afghanistan in 2001 to root out al Qaeda, to prevent future terrorist attacks against the United States planned from Afghanistan,” Biden said. “Our objective was clear. The cause was just.”

“I believed that our presence in Afghanistan should be focused on the reason we went in the first place: to ensure Afghanistan would not be used as a base from which to attack our homeland again,” he said.

This was undisputedly his right. The ultimate reason for our intervention in Afghanistan was “to ensure Afghanistan would not be used as a base from which to attack our homeland again.”

Biden then assured Americans that his administration would work from “over the horizon” to make sure this was the case.

“But we’ll not take our eye off the terrorist threat,” he said. “We’ll reorganize our counterterrorism capabilities and the substantial assets in the region to prevent reemergence of terrorists, of the threat to our homeland from over the horizon.”

Biden established September 11, 2021 as the deadline for the U.S. to withdraw.

Kabul was seized by the Taliban on Aug. 15.

On Aug. 26, an ISIS-Khorasan suicide bomber killed 13 U.S. troops and, according to the Congressional Research Service, “more than 150 Afghans” outside the Kabul airport.

On Aug. 30, Gen. Kenneth McKenzie of U.S. Central Command conducted a video conference press briefing.

“I am here to announce the completion of our withdrawal from Afghanistan and the end of the military mission to evacuate American citizens, third country nationals, and vulnerable Afghans,” said McKenzie. “The last C-17 lifted off from Hamid Karzai International Airport on Aug. 30, this afternoon at 3:29 p.m. East Coast time and the last manned aircraft is now clearing the airspace above Afghanistan.”

Biden delivered a second address from the White House the next day.

“Last night in Kabul, the United States ended 20 years of war in Afghanistan, the longest war in American history,” Biden said.

“We will maintain the fight against terrorism in Afghanistan and other countries,” he said. “We just don’t need to fight a ground war to do it. We have what’s called over-the-horizon capabilities, which means we can strike terrorists and targets without American boots on the ground—or very few, if needed.”

So, did Biden order U.S. forces out of Afghanistan only after he had ensured that “Afghanistan would not be used as a base from which to attack our homeland again”?

Is he keeping America safe against terrorists from Afghanistan?

In February, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released the 2022 “Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community.”

It made some observations regarding ISIS and Afghanistan.

“Communal conflict, insurgency, and instability almost certainly will provide terrorist groups continued opportunities to recruit members, acquire funds, and establish or expand safe havens from which to plot attacks—including reviving safe havens in Afghanistan,” said the assessment.

“The threat from ISIS against U.S. persons and interests probably will remain greatest in regions where the group has an operational presence,” said the assessment. “ISIS’s ideology and propaganda, however, almost certainly will continue to inspire attacks in the West, including in the United States.”

“In Afghanistan,” said the assessment, “ISIS-Khorasan is attempting to exploit an influx of funds and personnel from prison breaks to undermine the Taliban and build an external attack capability if it can withstand Taliban pressure.”

McKenzie testified this week before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

“ISIS and AQ (al Qaeda) are seeking to exploit a reduction of U.S. CT (counterterrorism) efforts in Afghanistan to reinvigorate their adherents and increase their ability to plot and direct external attacks,” McKenzie said in written testimony.

“The Department of Defense assesses ISIS-K could establish an external-attack capability against the United States and our allies in [12 to 18] months, but possibly sooner if the group experiences unanticipated gains in Afghanistan,” he said.

“AQ likely still aspires to recruit and train, and if successful, restore an external-attack capability against the United States and our allies in [12 to 24] months,” he told the committee.

“For the United States, conducting CT operations in Afghanistan from ‘over the horizon’ remains difficult, but not impossible,” McKenzie said in his written testimony.

“The loss of collection following the withdrawal of U.S. forces has exacerbated gaps in our intelligence,” he said, adding:

This limits the intelligence community’s ability to provide indications and warning of VEO (violent extremist organization) threats from Afghanistan. Also limited is the United States’ ability to fix and finish those threats we are able to find.

VEO groups may be able to pose greater threats to the United States, our allies, and the world if the CT pressure is reduced.

Sen. Deb Fischer, R.-Neb., interrogated McKenzie at this hearing.

“President Biden touted over-the-horizon counterterrorism operations as our new strategy to deal with the terrorist threat in Afghanistan,” she said. “Gen. McKenzie, have we conducted any over-the-horizon strike against ISIS-K targets in Afghanistan since August of last year?”

“Senator,” McKenzie responded, “we have conducted no strikes in Afghanistan.”

“I will tell you we have not undertaken any strikes in Afghanistan since the first of September,” McKenzie said later in the hearing.

We continue to monitor closely the growth of ISIS. They have made it through the winter. They have been able conduct some high-profile acts of terror.

They still dream of attacking the United States or our partners abroad.

Don’t be afraid. Biden will stop them from “over the horizon.”


The Daily Signal is open to all perspectives. Nothing here should be taken to mean that The Heritage Foundation views are represented.

You have an opinion on this article? Send an email to let us know your opinion. [email protected] and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Be sure to include the article’s URL, headline, and your name.