Graham Must Testify Following Supreme Court’s Rejection of Last-Ditch Appeal

The U.S. Supreme Courtroom has refused to listen to an attraction from Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), who was searching for an injunction blocking him from having to look earlier than a grand jury to offer testimony concerning an election interference inquiry within the state of Georgia.

Graham had beforehand misplaced an attraction from the eleventh Circuit Courtroom of Appeals after a district decide dominated that he needed to seem earlier than the grand jury to offer testimony concerning his conversations with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R) regarding the state’s 2020 presidential election final result. Graham had allegedly requested Raffensperger to disqualify all mail-in ballots from counties with excessive charges of signature discrepancies, even when it meant ballots with no points — the overwhelming majority of these despatched in — could be tossed apart and uncounted.

Had Raffensberger complied with Graham’s request, it will have excluded 1000’s of legit votes from the state’s whole. As a result of most mail-in ballots that 12 months got here from supporters of now-President Joe Biden, this is able to have illegitimately skewed the election ends in favor of Donald Trump.

A short lived injunction on the appeals court docket ruling for Graham to look earlier than the grand jury was issued by Justice Clarence Thomas late final month, as he’s accountable for overseeing the eleventh Circuit Courtroom. However on Tuesday, the Supreme Courtroom issued an order stating that it would not grant the request to hear Graham’s appeal.

The most recent order signifies that Graham should seem earlier than the grand jury to reply questions from Fulton County District Legal professional Fani Willis concerning his conversations with Raffensperger — and presumably questions on strategizing with Trump and his marketing campaign workforce to overturn the election end result within the state.

Graham should refuse to reply questions by citing his Fifth Amendment right to avoid incriminating himself.

It’s seemingly that Graham dedicated against the law in searching for to have mail-in ballots improperly discarded, as it’s unlawful within the state of Georgia to attempt to coerce an election official to have interaction in election fraud.

The Excessive Courtroom did write in its order on Tuesday that Graham doesn’t need to reply any questions concerning his official enterprise as a U.S. senator, nevertheless. It’s potential that Graham will declare in future appeals after assembly with the grand jury that he was performing inside his senatorial duties when making an attempt to coerce Raffensperger to low cost 1000’s of votes.

Graham emphasised that portion of the order in a press release issued by his workplace.

“The Senator’s authorized workforce intends to have interaction with the District Legal professional’s workplace on subsequent steps to make sure respect for this constitutional immunity,” the senator said in the statement.