Clarence Thomas Didn’t Get the Ketanji Brown Jackson Media Puffery

Liberal media viewed the Supreme Court nomination Ketanji brown Jackson to be a historic and magnificent event. Nobody needs to care about where she stands on things since she and the media share all the “correct opinions.”

The Associated Press issued a story under this tweet: “For Black girls, the possibility of Ketanji Brown Jackson being the first Black woman on the Supreme Court is a moment of promise, hope and the breaking of yet another barrier.”

However, on July 1, 1991 President George H.W. The networks were horrified when Clarence Thomas was nominated by President George H.W. Bush to the Supreme Court. He was a conservative, so he wasn’t black.

On ABC’s “World News Tonight,” reporter Tim O’Brien said that a “prominent black legal scholar called Thomas’ nomination to the Supreme Court insulting.”

It was Harvard’s Derrick Bell, the architect of critical race theory, who angrily claimed, “To place a person who looks black, and in conservative terms thinks white, is an insult.”

On “NBC Nightly News,” Jim Miklaszewski forwarded liberals who said, “Thomas tried to dismantle affirmative action,” and then found Rep. John Lewis to say, “But simply because he’s black doesn’t make him right or make him good for the United States Supreme Court.”

The NBC reporter concluded, “With opposition to the nomination from within the minority community itself, it’s hard to see just how this could help George Bush politically.” Now NBC is suggesting President Joe Biden’s nomination of Jackson will boost him politically.

Black opinion writers were even more shocked by the Thomas pick. Barbara Reynolds of USA Today proclaimed, “If Hugo Black, who once was a member of the KKK, could become a distinguished liberal justice, there is hope that a Negro can turn black.”

Columnist Carl Rowan punched low: “If you gave Clarence Thomas a little flour on his face, you’d think you had David Duke talking.”

Then, two days before the Thomas hearings in September 1991, NBC’s “Sunday Today” promised to provide the pros and cons of Thomas. But its “pro-Thomas” argument consisted of one question in a profile of black conservative Rep. Gary Franks, R-Conn., where anchor Garrick Utley found hypocrisy.

Like Thomas, Utley said, Franks went to Yale “under an affirmative action program. Yet today, he battles the Democratic civil rights bill in Congress.”

Then, NBC aired a scathing anti–Thomas commentary by Bob Herbert, a black journalist. “Who is this guy, Clarence Thomas, and why should we want him on the Supreme Court? I can’t think of any good reasons. The man is not distinguished and he doesn’t seem to have a heart,” Herbert lectured.

Then he called Thomas a “tool of the rich and powerful” backed by Dan Quayle, Jesse Helms, and Strom Thurmond. “Even David Duke, former Ku Klux Klan leader, is crazy about Clarence Thomas. Make no mistake—old people, poor people, black people, women, forget about it. Clarence Thomas is not your friend.”

In September, Reynolds again attacked Thomas. “Here’s a man who’s going to decide crucial issues for the country and he has already said no to blacks; he has already said if he can’t paint himself white, he’ll think white and marry a white woman.”

No liberal journalist will employ phrases like “saying no to blacks” or “painting herself white” to describe Jackson marrying a white man.

All this came before Anita Hill’s sexual harassment smears in October 1991.

Journalists tout black “lived experience” for the high court, but they savagely attack minorities who are conservative. Don’t forget their experiences. The outpouring of media hostility felt like what Thomas described as a “high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves.”


The Daily Signal offers a variety perspectives. Nothing here should be taken to mean that The Heritage Foundation views are represented.

You have an opinion on this article? Please email to share your thoughts. [email protected] and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Include the article’s URL or headline, as well as your name and hometown.