Chuck Norris: Hillary's Top 5 Lies

October 26, 2015Oct 26, 2015


What really happened with Benghazi? Senator Clinton had an 11 hour interrogation last week, but very little answers were found. The elusive rhetoric is so shifty that most of us a) don't have the time (or desire) to sit and watch all 11 hours, or b) don't have the resources to fact-check every statement.

Luckily, Chuck Norris does. And in his latest op-ed for, entitled "Hillary: Chronic Congenital Liar", Norris shares with us his top 5 Clinton lies, because he is so passionate to see justice done for the four courageous Americans who lost their lives in Benghazi.


Here it is, straight from America's hero:

*Hillary bogus statement No. 5: Clinton said that before the Benghazi terror attack, “There was a good back and forth about security,” in reference to communications between U.S. personnel in Libya and the State Department in Washington.

The facts: The independent Accountability Review Board that Hillary herself convened after the attack “deeply faulted State Department officials in Washington for poor communication and cooperation as diplomats in Libya pressed for more security and Benghazi grew more dangerous,” according to the AP.

Hillary bogus statement No. 4: Clinton furthermore asserted that personnel in Benghazi “were granted many of their requests” and “some improvements to the mission’s security.”

The facts: Again, according to AP, the independent Accountability Review Board concluded that “Washington showed a tendency to overemphasize the positive impact of physical security upgrades” to a “profoundly weak” system. Moreover, leaders in Washington were “generally failing to meet Benghazi’s repeated requests” to improve security.

It is simply unthinkable that the U.S. State Department personnel in Libya made approximately 600 requests for better security in Benghazi, and yet all of them were unheeded and escaped the notice of Hillary and her underlings and were not even brought up to her during any security meetings, at least according to her.

Hillary bogus statement No. 3: Clinton said the advice of her friend and political chum Sidney Blumenthal, who wrote her more than 150 emails, which included reports of developments in Libya, was “unsolicited … I did not ask him to send me the information that he sent me.”

The facts: In response to Blumenthal’s reports, Hillary responded to him via her email, “Thanks and please keep them coming,” ”Anything else to convey?” and “What are you hearing now?”

Once confronted with this email evidence, Clinton revised her statement to say the email reports were “originally unsolicited.”

Hillary bogus statement No. 2:  As an excuse that emails could have avoided her and had not been her primary form of communication, Clinton told the congressional committee, “I did not email during the day and – except on rare occasions when I was able to.”

The facts: AP fact check concluded, “Clinton sent about one-third of her emails during working hours – on weekdays between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. – according to an AP analysis of 2,754 emails she wrote from April 2009 through September 2010, based on time stamps on the messages.”

Hillary bogus statement No. 1:  Clinton denied that she ever blamed the Benghazi terrorist attack on an anti-Islamic movie trailer posted on YouTube. Instead, she tried to justify her 2012 words as actually not blaming the video:”I referred to the video that night in a very specific way. I said some have sought to justify the attack because of the video. I used those words deliberately, not to ascribe a motive to every attacker but as a warning to those across the region that there was no justification for further attacks.”

The facts: At 10:08 p.m. on the night of the attack, Clinton released a statement saying, “Some have sought to justify the vicious behavior (in Benghazi) as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet.”

However, one hour later, she wrote an email to her daughter that explained: “Two officers were killed today in Benghazi by an al-Qaeda-like group.”

The next day after the attack on our Libyan compound, she similarly told to the Egyptian prime minister: “We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack, not a protest.”

Yet, on Sept. 14, 2012, three days after the attack on the U.S. compound, President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton spoke at the transfer of remains ceremony of the four Americans killed in Benghazi. In public, Hillary continued to blame the anti-Islamic video for the assault: “This has been a difficult week for the State Department and for our country. We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with. It is hard for the American people to make sense of that because it is senseless, and it is totally unacceptable.”

Even the diary entry from a Benghazi victim’s dad, which was released just a few days ago, corroborated Hillary’s accusations when he wrote what she personally told him at that transfer of remains ceremony on Sept. 14: “I gave Hillary a hug and shook her hand. And she said we are going to have the film maker arrested who was responsible for the death of my son.”

And yet, now, in October 2015, Hillary testifies before a congressional committee that she never blamed the anti-Islamic video for the Benghazi killing of four courageous Americans? *


Thank you, Chuck! We need to hear the clear-cut facts set against what Senator Clinton is saying, because everything we hear in the mainstream media can be so misleading!

What do you think? Do you think Hillary is lying or do you think she is innocent? Let us know your thoughts in the Comments! Share this article to get the facts out! Thank you!