AOC: Roberts Allows Supreme Court to Erode Rights But Won’t Rein in Corruption

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) has condemned Supreme Courtroom Chief Justice John Roberts for declining an invite from the Senate to testify in an upcoming listening to relating to the ethics of the Supreme Courtroom, as spurred by current revelations of corruption amongst justices.

On Tuesday, Roberts sent a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) saying that he “should respectfully decline” the invitation to testify earlier than the committee subsequent week. He wrote that it’s “exceedingly uncommon” for a chief justice to look earlier than Congress — although some lawmakers have identified that the circumstances necessitating his appearance are additionally excessive, and warrant an equally excessive response.

Ocasio-Cortez stated on Tuesday that Roberts bears accountability for the present corruption on the Excessive Courtroom, and denounced his choice to not seem within the Senate.

“Beneath Roberts, the Supreme Courtroom has unraveled constitutional rights and seen a number of justices interact in corrupt monetary preparations. Now he’s refusing to reply questions,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Twitter.

“How does Roberts anticipate SCOTUS to take care of authority in the event that they reject accountability themselves?” she requested.

The lawmaker has beforehand stated that, if Roberts refuses to behave to rein within the appalling corruption of Supreme Courtroom justices, his legacy as chief justice shall be endlessly tarnished.

“Barring some dramatic change, that is what the Roberts court docket shall be identified for: rank corruption, erosion of democracy, and the stripping of human rights,” Ocasio-Cortez stated earlier this month, after ProPublica published the bombshell report relating to right-wing Justice Clarence Thomas that’s now spurring widespread requires reform throughout the Supreme Courtroom. She known as for Thomas to be impeached over the revelations.

Roberts has certainly been closely criticized over his refusal to testify, with critics noting that it’s only the most recent instance of Roberts refusing to acknowledge ethics issues relating to Thomas in previous a long time, as members of the Senate Judiciary Committee raised after they introduced the listening to this month.

Certainly, his refusal to testify comes as reporters are uncovering a seemingly unprecedented stage of corruption on the Supreme Courtroom. Simply up to now few weeks, studies have uncovered that Thomas has for many years acquired lavish presents from and bought property to a GOP billionaire megadonor with out disclosing it, and that Neil Gorsuch has skirted disclosure necessities to cover his property sale to the CEO of a serious regulation agency that often seems earlier than the Courtroom.

The studies have proven that justices seemingly can’t even comply with the lax guidelines that Supreme Courtroom justices are legally sure to. Consultants have stated that Thomas’s failure to reveal his monetary ties with billionaire Harlan Crow have damaged disclosure legal guidelines, however that there’s a culture of impunity for justices. In the meantime, there appears to be little method to act towards the obtrusive ethics issues on show, as a result of the Supreme Courtroom is the one court docket within the U.S. that’s not legally sure to an ethics code.

Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee expressed deep frustration over Roberts’s refusal to testify, and have known as for the Supreme Courtroom to be sure to an ethics code.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-Rhode Island) wrote that the truth that Roberts isn’t keen to implement ethics pointers implies that there are primarily no guidelines relating to the Supreme Courtroom.

“The gaping gap in in the present day’s response from Roberts to the Senate Judiciary Committee is that it overlooks the entire failure of course of relating to ethics questions involving the justices. When there’s no ref, there’s no rule, as a sensible matter,” Whitehouse wrote. “The liberties that justices have taken are egregious, as they benefit from there being no ref to learn the foundations to go well with their comfort.”

Durbin criticized Roberts for ignoring the truth that Thomas has repeatedly violated not simply ethics requirements, but additionally disclosure legal guidelines. “I’m stunned that the Chief Justice’s recounting of present authorized requirements of ethics suggests present regulation is enough and ignores the apparent. The actions of 1 Justice, together with journeys on yachts and personal jets, weren’t reported to the general public. That very same Justice did not disclose the sale of properties he partly owned to a celebration with pursuits earlier than the Supreme Courtroom,” Durbin said in a press release.

“It’s time for Congress to simply accept its accountability to ascertain an enforceable code of ethics for the Supreme Courtroom, the one company of our authorities with out it,” he added.

​​30 seconds is all it takes to make a distinction

Because the world modifications at an unprecedented tempo, we’d like moral, unbiased information greater than ever earlier than. We’d like journalists who can examine, report, and analyze complicated points with honesty and integrity. We’d like journalists who can maintain these in energy accountable, shine a light-weight on injustices, and provides voice to the unvoiced.

Truthout depends on reader donations to take care of this sanctuary for sincere, justice-driven journalism. Now we have simply 1 day left in our fundraiser and $25,000 nonetheless to boost — we’d like all our associates to assist us attain this aim. It takes lower than 30 seconds to offer, so when you worth a free and unbiased press, please make a tax-deductible donation in the present day!