Amazon Loses Bid to Overturn Union’s Historic Win in New York

A federal labor official has rejected Amazon’s bid to overturn a union election in Staten Island, New York, that saw the formation of the first-ever union at the company earlier this year.

This AprilWorkers at JFK8 warehouse on Staten Island voted by 523 votes to unionize. The company filed a challenge to the win shortly after — which the company lost on Thursday when NLRB hearing officer Lisa Dunn, who was overseeing Amazon’s challenge, recommended that the objections be “rejected in their entirety,” according to NLRB spokesperson Kayla Blado.

Dunn found that the company didn’t meet the burden to prove any of their allegations and recommended that the board designate Amazon Labor Union (ALU), the bargaining agent for warehouses with over 8,000 employees. The board will issue a formal ruling on Dunn’s decision, and though Amazon plans to appeal the recommendations, the formal decision typically follows a hearing officer’s recommendation.

The union celebrated the decision, and stated that it is ready for more fights from company. “While we are pleased with [Dunn’s] findings, the Amazon workers in the ALU understand that this is just the beginning of a much longer fight,” the union said in a statement. “Amazon’s abuse of the legal process is simply a stalling tactic that is meant to delay our negotiations and cause workers to lose faith in the process.”

In fact, labor officials had. hold over three weeks of hearings in order to consider Amazon’s 25 objections. The corporation claimed that union organizers took illegal actions during the campaign for union membership and that the National Labor Relations Board, (NLRB), had suppressed voter turnout.

Dunn found that Amazon had not established that any of its allegations had affected the outcome of the election or that it was the NLRB’s responsibility to step in on behalf of the company. For instance, the labor board found no merit in Amazon’s allegation that union organizers gave marijuana to workers to buy votes, or that Amazon had trouble communicating its message to workers due to some interruptions to the company’s anti-union meetings.

It was Amazon, in fact. who violated federal labor lawsDuring the campaign, the NLRB discovered in May that the meetings claimed by Amazon were not interrupted. were illegal to begin withThe company had taken a variety of actions against the union, including threatening to sue. To withhold benefitsWorkers, which was also illegally found by the NLRB.

The union’s win this spring was a shock to the labor movement; ALU, an independent union, had faced long odds with a fierce anti-union campaign from the company and with an election on the heels of A failed voteAlabama, Bessemer, where workers voted against joining Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Unions (RWDSU).

The NLRB had Ordered a rerunLast year, the workers at Bessemer claimed that Amazon had illegally interfered in the election. The result of the rerun MarchThe results of more than 400 ballots that were challenged are still being considered.

ALU is currently running a campaign for union membership Albany, New YorkThe warehouse workers of the company filed a union petition last year seeking representation for its approximately 400 employees.

A message for our readers

Friends, you may know that we’ve been fundraising tirelessly for the last few months, and you might be wondering why. The truth is that we’ve continued to face blatant censorship from big tech companies – Facebook and Google. These companies have made algorithmic changes that have forced TruthoutTo the bottom of social media searches and feeds, prefer corporate media companies. This is an unprecedented attack on independent journalism, and it’s not going away anytime soon.

These changes have had a detrimental effect on our budget over the years. Sadly, TruthoutYou cannot rely solely upon the web traffic and one-time donations from visitors. After more than two decades of publishing, there is an existential threat. We must now take action to face this new challenge.

As we’ve looked for a new way to be sustainable, we’ve determined that we must increase (in fact, double) our number of monthly donors. We’re making progress, but we still need 33 people to become sustainers by the end of today. When our readers give monthly, we can continue our unapologetic journalism knowing that we’re answerable to our readers, not corporate sponsors or ad salespeople. You can also join a progressive community that cares deeply about truthful, uncompromising news by giving monthly.

Start your tax-deductible monthly donation Truthout today.

Donate Now