Lizzo’s Former Dancers Respond After Singer Addresses Lawsuit

Lizzo's Response to Lawsuit Was an Example of More 'Gaslighting' and 'Retaliation,' Dancers Claim

Lizzo
Daniel DeSlover/Shutterstock

Dancers Arianna Davis, Crystal Williams and Noelle Rodriguez aren’t impressed with Lizzo’s response to their lawsuit.

The trio opened as much as Leisure Tonight after Lizzo, 35, issued a prolonged assertion denying their hostile work setting accusations. “I feel for me, it’s simply very fascinating to be so open and real concerning the trauma that we skilled and to be open concerning the harm that she brought on us, for her to [respond back by] basically gaslighting us,” Williams claimed on Thursday, August 3. “She by no means acknowledged any of the claims [directly] that we’ve got introduced ahead to the desk.”

Williams argued that Lizzo’s response “solidifies the sample” of what she and her fellow dancers allegedly skilled whereas working for the Grammy winner. “Each time we carry up a problem, each time we advocate for ourselves, each time we converse up for ourselves, we’re met with retaliation as an alternative of, ‘OK, you skilled this. As an artist and what I characterize, I don’t need you to really feel like I don’t care about you,’” she continued. “‘I don’t need you to really feel like I don’t need to embody you. I don’t need you to really feel like I’m body-shaming you. If that is what you’re feeling, I’d fully disagree with you however, I can at the least attempt to hear you out to see how we are able to go shifting ahead.’”

The obvious lack of accountability “additional proves” the dancers’ claims. “We have been continuously being gaslit, and he or she’s continuously deflecting,” Williams stated.

Us Weekly confirmed on Tuesday, August 1, that Lizzo, her Huge Grrrl Huge Touring manufacturing firm and dance captain Shirlene Quigley have been sued. Davis, Williams and Rodriguez alleged that they skilled spiritual harassment, incapacity discrimination, sexual harassment and extra as a part of Lizzo’s troupe.

Lizzo responded two days later with a prolonged Instagram assertion calling out the “false” and “unbelievable” accusations. “​​These sensationalized tales are coming from former workers who’ve already publicly admitted that they have been instructed their habits on tour was inappropriate and unprofessional,” she alleged on Thursday. “As an artist, I’ve at all times been very obsessed with what I do. I take my music and my performances severely as a result of on the finish of the day, I solely need to put out the very best artwork that represents me and my followers.”

Lizzo asserted that she is “not the villain” that the dancers declare she is. “There’s nothing I take extra severely than the respect we deserve as girls on the earth,” she wrote, including that she felt “harm” by the lawsuit’s narrative.

As extra particulars concerning the lawsuit emerged, filmmaker Sophia Nahli Allison shared her personal expertise of collaborating with Lizzo in 2019. Allison briefly labored with the singer on a tour documentary however in the end exited the challenge.

“I walked away after about 2 weeks. I used to be handled with such disrespect by her,” she tweeted on Tuesday, claiming she “felt gaslit and was deeply harm” by Lizzo.

Relating to litigation, legal professional Neama Rahmani thinks the dancers could be ready to carry their allegations to trial. “We by no means know. Most circumstances do settle, however that is one I can simply see going to trial, as a result of typically entertainers, whether or not it’s simply denial or narcissism, they’re unwilling to simply accept that they possibly have finished one thing flawed,” the lawyer completely instructed Us.

Rahmani hinted {that a} “decision” could possibly be “attainable” if all events performed their playing cards proper. “The ball’s in Lizzo’s court docket now, and we’ll see what she and her attorneys do, and that’ll actually decide whether or not this case will get litigated or tried,” he stated.