Democrats Introduce Bill to Place 18-Year Term Limits on Supreme Court Justices

In reaction to the recent onslaught of extremist rulings by far right Supreme Court justices, a group of Democrats introduced a bill on Tuesday that would place term limits on the Supreme Court in order to “restore legitimacy” to the institution.

The bill introduced byRep. Hank Johnson, a Democratic from Georgia, in the House and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D.Rhode Island), in the Senate, would create 18-year terms for Supreme Court Justices. The president would nominate a justice every second year, in the first and third year after a presidential election.

The lawmakers say that the bill is crucial to combat the Supreme Court’s Rapidly eroding legitimacyto restore public confidence in the institution. The Supreme Court enjoys the trust of the public has sunk to record lows after the Court’s far-right majority handed A series ofJune was a month of right-wing decisions, including overturning Roe v. WadeThis law created dangerous abortion bans across the nation. The bill is called the Supreme Court Tenure Establishment and Retirement Modernization Act. It has six cosponsors.

“Five of the six conservative justices on the bench were appointed by presidents who lost the popular vote, and they are now racing to impose their out-of-touch agenda on the American people,” Johnson, chair of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet, said in a statement. “Term limits are a necessary step toward restoring balance to this radical, unrestrained majority on the court.”

The bill also has the support of Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-New York), the chair of the House Judiciary Committee, who said that the bill is “essential.” Without term limits, “we will be left with [a] backwards-looking majority for a generation or more,” Nadler said.

After a justice’s 18 years on the court, they would move to a lifetime “senior” status, in which they would retain their pay and perform certain official duties; this is the same option currently offered to justices if they choose to retire. If there were an unscheduled vacancy among the Court’s nine seats — whether the result of death, illness, or otherwise — the justice that most recently moved to senior status would temporarily fill the role.

The government watchdogs have Long sought afterReforms to the Supreme Court, including term limits being implemented and an increase in the number of justices; even justices themselvesAccording to them, term limits would help reduce corruption and be prudent. Advocacy groups believe that term limits would depoliticize the process for confirming a justice as well as the Court. This would also help to prevent extremist takeovers of Court, such as the one that occurred in recent years.

This bill is one of a number of suggestions from Democrats. ReformThe Supreme Court. Democrats also demanded that justices be investigated. potential impeachmentIn response to the RoeOverturn and The wide range of other authoritarian decisionsThese are the Court’s recent decisions.

In May, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, and Rep. Pramila Japal (D–Washington) The Judicial Ethics and Anti-Corruption Act was introducedThe bill would prohibit federal judges from trading individual stocks and would bind the Supreme Court under a code of ethics. The Supreme Court is the only federal court that isn’t bound by law to an ethics code.

Democrats have Also introducedBills to add four more seats to the Supreme Court would increase the number of justices to 13, which would make it 13. They claim that Republicans are not able to be elected. have hijacked theCourt and that it be expanded would be a common-sense approach to fighting the extremism which has infiltrated the institution.

The reforms to the Supreme Court are very popular with the American public. Soon after the Dobbs v. JacksonLast month, a ruling was made to end federal abortion protections. A Politico/Morning Consult poll found69% of Americans agree that justices should adhere to an ethics code. 62 percent support term limits. A plurality of respondents, at 45 per cent, supported expanding the Supreme Court.